Supreme Court adjourns hearing on Article 35A, trollers creating a lot of confusion

Supreme Court adjourns hearing on Article 35A, trollers creating a lot of confusion

Supreme Court has adjourned the hearing on pleas challenging Article 35 A to August 27.  The SC which heard the arguments from both the ends has postponed this controversial case’ further hearing to 27th August 2018.

Due to high volatile situations in Jammu and Kashmir, bandh is continuing for the third day too. What is Article 35 A? On this, trolls pertaining to both BJP and Congress confusing the Indians in other parts of the nation who excitingly follow this case.

As per some favoritists of BJP,  under Article 35(A) there have been special rights given to J&K people’ protection and the non-residents have no right to buy any property, not eligible for any government job and even the non-residents have no right to cast their vote in J&K assembly elections also. How is a law varies in Jammu and Kashmir which is the integral part of India than other states? Trollers questioning how a nation has two constitutions. The Article 35A was instituted in the Indian constitution(1954) even before the J&K constitution, which was in 1956.
 

The other section of trollers and some section of J&K people’ giving completely different voice as if the Article  35 A is removed, the situation in Jammu and Kashmir even turn worse than now. And the peace in the valley will forever vanish. 

The favoritists of BJP say that the removal of Article 35A will put an end to the paid stone pelters, separatists which apparently give a way to the elimination of terrorists who are hiding in.